------- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-29 21:13 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Here is a reduced/modified version of the code in comment #0, which also > exhibits a runtime segfault, although the code seems to be valid: [...] > it prints the following output: > ifc: ( 1.0000000 , 0.0000000 ) ( 2.0000000 , 0.0000000 ) ( > 3.0000000 , 0.0000000 ) > ap > Segmentation fault
For completeness: With NAG f95 v5.1, ifort, and crayftn it prints: ifc: (1.,0.), (2.,0.), (3.,0.) ap gd -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44912
