------- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-29 21:07 ------- For completeness, the current patch has failures for for following test cases. In particular:
- Reading - here, the d == 0 does not harm (e.g. fmt_bz_bn.f). - FMT_G: Here, the the width check is wrong (e.g. transpose_reshape_r10.f90) - For writing, for 1P it might be zero, cf. fmt_zero_digits.f90 Thus, the simple check does not make much sense. Probably, one should just remove it and leave only warning part in - with a fix for Gw.d? For read, more is possible - but I think the fields are small enough that one could still warn - or should one restrict the warning to WRITE/PRINT - and not include READ/FORMAT? gfortran.dg/fmt_bz_bn.f gfortran.dg/fmt_read_bz_bn.f90 gfortran.dg/fmt_zero_digits.f90 gfortran.dg/fmt_zero_precision.f90 gfortran.dg/io_constraints_4.f90 gfortran.dg/past_eor.f90 gfortran.dg/read_infnan_1.f90 gfortran.dg/transpose_reshape_r10.f90 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45129
