------- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-23 11:24 ------- Created an attachment (id=21293) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21293&action=view) Draft patch
Draft patch. I was wondering whether one needs to take care of (a) use names in case of use association - or can one not reach that function in this case? (b) C binding names, i.e. subroutine foo() bind(C, name=bar) ... entry foo2() bind(C, name=bar2) ... end interface subroutine Hello() bind(C,name=bar2) end end interface call Hello() ! << this should use the same backend decl as "ENTRY foo2". (c) Whether this just fixes the error checking or whether the backend_decl is also correct. What do you think, Paul? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45030
