------- Comment #3 from Hans dot Boehm at hp dot com 2010-07-22 18:03 ------- Is there a plan for more complete C++0x/C1x atomics support? Something eventually needs to implement the memory_order_acquire/memory_order_release versions of these primitives? Nptl also seems to be in need of these. I agree that it would be unfortunate to use inline assembly code here at this point in time.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45025