------- Comment #8 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-15 17:49 ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Hehe, I am really not C++ guy even in 2010, but I have impression that people > are including iostream without really thinking about consequences here.
Yes, and in many cases that's the simplest thing to do, but it has a cost. > Well, so what we can do about the startup times then? I would do nothing. If people care about startup times they should not include facilities they don't use. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44952
