------- Comment #15 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-11 22:48 ------- Well, it's probably worth trying a little harder to grok them, then. Zdenek has already said that the fix looks OK in principle, but I am not interested at all in working on this patch anymore (especially not when others with an interest in the patch get paid for caring :-).
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39837