------- Comment #9 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2010-07-11 16:54 ------- Subject: Re: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr35258.c execution test
> The above testcase worked? Not the pr35258.c, but the one I gave, with > the int aligned(1)? The difference on the 4.5 branch is that we left the > memcpy call alone and did not inline-expand it on the tree level. The above testcase doesn't work with 4.5 and I doubt it ever worked on PA. The pointer passed to foo is used as is. It's only the memcpy special case that is handled by 4.5 and earlier. > I am trying to say that we hit a latent bug here, and that it's finally time > to fix it (but I don't easily see how to do that in the most efficient way). Dave -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44903
