------- Comment #11 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-07-09 13:51 ------- FWIW, the original testcase, vibanl.fppized.f, doesn't have type mismatch.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44882
[Bug fortran/44882] [4.6 Regression] Bogus types in references with mismatched commons
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com Fri, 09 Jul 2010 06:51:29 -0700
- [Bug middle-end/44882] [4.6 Regression] Fai... hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
- [Bug middle-end/44882] [4.6 Regression] Fai... dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
- [Bug middle-end/44882] [4.6 Regression] Fai... rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug middle-end/44882] [4.6 Regression] Fai... rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug fortran/44882] [4.6 Regression] Failed... rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug fortran/44882] [4.6 Regression] Failed... rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug fortran/44882] [4.6 Regression] Bogus ... rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug fortran/44882] [4.6 Regression] Bogus ... burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug fortran/44882] [4.6 Regression] Bogus ... rguenther at suse dot de
- [Bug fortran/44882] [4.6 Regression] Bogus ... burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug fortran/44882] [4.6 Regression] Bogus ... hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
- [Bug fortran/44882] [4.6 Regression] Bogus ... dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
