------- Comment #9 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-07-01 15:57 ------- (In reply to comment #8) > > This may be a duplicate of pr44662. Could you try the patch in > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44662#c2 ? > > It is not.
Agreed for this pr (and pr44745 is a duplicate). However I think pr44746 is a duplicate of pr44596 and should be fixed by the patch in its comment #2. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44596
