------- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-25 06:14 ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Subject: Re: [regression 4.4/4.5/4.6] ICE in > resolve_equivalence() > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 23:02, kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org > <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > > > > > Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-25 04:02 ------- > > Index: resolve.c > > =================================================================== > > --- resolve.c (revision 161047) > > +++ resolve.c (working copy) > > @@ -12506,6 +12506,9 @@ resolve_equivalence (gfc_equiv *eq)
> This patch doesn't fix the problem I am seeing. If I'm testing this > in the loop before taking the value of e->symtree->n.sym->ts, then it > passes without ICE: We'll need another test case then. However, I note that... > diff --git a/gcc/fortran/resolve.c b/gcc/fortran/resolve.c > index 48bb618..7f66be4 100644 > --- a/gcc/fortran/resolve.c > +++ b/gcc/fortran/resolve.c > @@ -12360,6 +12360,9 @@ resolve_equivalence (gfc_equiv *eq) ... there is a 200 line difference in the location of your diff and my clean trunk. Do you have other changes in your source code? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44660
