------- Comment #4 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-16 11:58 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> > but it is an explicit specialization of the *definition* of the variable
>
> No it is a specialization of the declaration. There are only specialization
> of
> declarations; never definitions. Re-read the link you gave and you will see
> the following: "Explicit specialization declaration syntax" .
So what the above code actually means? Is it valid?
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44548
