------- Comment #5 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-06-10 08:14
-------
Thanks Jason. Actually, the issue seems already known, LWG 1326, Bullet 4 of
the proposed resolution (the name of the issue isn't particularly telling, I
would say). It's still [New] But I guess we had better implementing it together
with removing the non-templatized pair(pair&&). I'll make sure that at least
this bit of the proposed resolution is carried forward (what else ;)
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |paolo dot carlini at oracle
|dot org |dot com
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-06-10 08:14:47
date| |
Summary|pair of references doesn't |[LWG 1326] pair of
|work in c++0x mode |references doesn't work in
| |c++0x mode
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44487
