------- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-08 09:55 -------
Did you reduce the number of object files already? Note that you are linking
without optimization (and you probably built the .o files with optimization?)
So this might be a duplicate of PR41159.
Can you put output of adding -v to one of the .o file compiles? Can you
put preprocessed source of all .o file sources that are required to reproduce
the bug somewhere?
Thx.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Keywords| |lto
Version|lto |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44464
