------- Comment #4 from meklund at cisco dot com 2010-06-07 15:26 ------- I see your point that some legacy code might use a larger size as a flexible array.
What is you opinion on the possibility of adding a bit-flag to __builtin_object_size() (like 0x04) that tightens the allowed flexible array size to be only 0 or 1? Larger sizes would be accepted as the total array size. This would be closer to that in http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.5.0/gcc/Zero-Length.html#Zero-Length. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44386
