------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-03 22:37 ------- I think this one case is where the copy constructor can be skipped.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44409
[Bug c++/44409] explicit call of a defined copy constructor does not work
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org Thu, 03 Jun 2010 15:38:23 -0700
- [Bug c++/44409] New: explicit call of a de... gcc at razorcam dot com
- [Bug c++/44409] explicit call of a def... pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug c++/44409] explicit call of a def... redi at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug c++/44409] explicit call of a def... gcc at razorcam dot com
- [Bug c++/44409] explicit call of a def... redi at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug c++/44409] explicit call of a def... redi at gcc dot gnu dot org
