------- Comment #13 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com  2010-06-03 10:16 
-------
About -Weffc++, we also have a PR (16166) about splitting it... Not that I
think we should really do that - adding a dozen of -Weffc++-type warnings - but
I believe it would be a good idea to finally resolve one way or the other all
those long standing -Weffc++ PRs (we have 5 or 6)... If you ask my opinion, we
should probably *not* split the option, and instead reduce *a lot* the false
positives for the various warnings, even if that means adding false negatives.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2972

Reply via email to