------- Comment #15 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2010-06-02 17:30 ------- (In reply to comment #14) > I'm fairly sure that's not valid. > That relies on an implicit conversion to bool
actually that's nonsense ... that is a contextual conversion! anyway, I'll look into it properly and fix it asap -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40296
