------- Comment #5 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-05-31 19:24 ------- > The question becomes whether the 'I' in the implied-do-loop is > being used uninitialized.
>From comment #3, I think the 'i' in "i,i=" should not be the same as the 'i' in "=1,i". > Confirmed. However, having this in real world codes seems like the best way to > confuse people. Agreed!-) I am always baffled by the users' talent to make their life miserable. Nevertheless the compiler should follow the standard, i.e., from my understanding of the construct, print the 1 to 5 sequence. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44354
