------- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-20 20:24 -------
My first feeling was that this would be illegal, but I could not find anything
in the standard supporting this feeling. F03 only has the following
restrictions:
C427 (R429) If the type definition contains or inherits (4.5.6.1) a
deferred binding (4.5.4), ABSTRACT shall appear.
C428(R429) If ABSTRACT appears, the type shall be extensible.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code
Known to fail| |4.6.0
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-05-20 20:24:30
date| |
Summary|[OOP] ICE when extending |ICE when extending abstract
|abstract type |type
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44213
