------- Comment #5 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-17 13:43 ------- (In reply to comment #4)
> In my powerpc-apple-darwin9 tree I have the patch in > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-05/msg01119.html for a quite long time OK, might be worth double-checking - both parts are needed. > (and I guess it is not applied in the "native" tree of regress). nope. that's just trunk. With revision > 159371, I see the same failures as regress. These failures disappear if I > revert revision 159371 without any other change in my tree. I have clean libgomp results and only LTO FE fails, on powerpc-apple-darwin9 @159476 with http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-05/msg01119.html but... *without* changing varpool.c. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44163
