------- Comment #18 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-16 14:26 ------- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #12)
> that doesn't really explain why this should be repeatably affected by the > reversion of 159371.. Yesterday (on an initially failing bootstrap) I applied the suggestion @ comment #2 and the problem cleared. However, I then removed this change and the problem still cleared. the next time this happens to any of the interested parties: could you try make clean-target-libstdc++-v3 make <options you usually use> all-target -- and see if the phenomenon is essentially randomly dependent on the layout of the code? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44146
