------- Comment #9 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-11 16:48 ------- (In reply to comment #8) > In this case, I guess the way to go would be to apply *both* my patch > and Hans-Peter's patch to the 4.4 branch ...
I'm sorry I missed that the committed patch was fingered as a regressor (sp?). Anyway the above approach sounds right. The 4.4 branch results looks good for cris-elf in my autotester FWIW. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41064
