------- Comment #26 from justinmattock at gmail dot com 2010-05-06 13:31 ------- (In reply to comment #23) > Justin, your comment 7 reminded me of my problem (unrelated to this bug report > - sorry): > 'busybox ls' and 'ninit' (didn't test SYSV 'init') segfault when booting a > kernel compiled with CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y (which means -Os). I am > running gcc-4.5 on x86_64. > If you could reproduce your init segfault with a stable kernel compiled with > -Os by a gcc snapshot, it would mean a regression since gcc-4.4. Currently the > data I have seems too vague for a bug report and I probably won't have time to > test a gcc snapshot until monday. >
no, no reason to be sorry..that was the initial reason for the bug report. but if building the kernel with a stable gcc snapshot(with -0s), then we have something thats been lingering for some time. (reason for having a git bisect handy); -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43791
