------- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-05 01:59
-------
This is not invalid and is a feature request. I do think that -w will silence
warnings. I do not see a need to treat this particular warning any differently
then all the rest of the legacy warnings we have. For example, to run the NIST
test suite, I use -w in the script because there are hundreds of warnings.
OTOH I can see where a program that has a lot of real do loops would be
irritating. I think that the standard does not explicitly say issue four
warnings as long as each is detected. I am using "detected" in the sense that
each is found and we issue a broader warning message.
So I suggest we mark as an enhancement and when some one has time, we could
implement a consolidated error message.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |enhancement
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-05-05 01:59:10
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40165
