------- Comment #37 from mrs at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-03 21:39 ------- First question to decide is what direction they want to go with it, that's an LTO question. Once that is decided, if the direction to do is to change darwin.c, I have given the 3 lines to do that, what remains undone with that solution is testing, and the correct spelling of LTO_SYM, both of which are LTO issues. I could create a patch with the addition of the three lines, but that isn't any harder than just cutting and pasting the three lines given, I don't think. Let me know the spelling and I can.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43729
