------- Comment #1 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-28 19:08 -------
Right: this is both a regression from 3.4 and in violation of the DWARF-3 spec,
p. 63, 5.1, where DW_AT_name is a required field for DW_TAG_base_type.
--
ro at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail| |4.4.3 4.6.0
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-04-28 19:08:22
date| |
Summary|incorrect dwarf data gcc- |[4.4, 4.5, 4.6 regression]
|4.4.2 |incorrect dwarf data gcc-
| |4.4.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42278
