------- Comment #8 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-20 09:21 -------
Please treat DW_AT_linkage_name the same as DW_AT_MIPS_linkage_name, for
-gdwarf-4 the patch I've posted yesterday emits the former rather than latter.
Currently the addition of DW_AT_{,MIPS_}linkage_name is guarded with
&& !is_fortran ()
that would probably need to go away.
BTW, should DW_AT_{,MIPS_}linkage_name be also present on DW_TAG_common_block?
If yes, we need to file a request similar to
http://dwarfstd.org/ShowIssue.php?issue=100419.4&type=open
for DW_AT_linkage_name to be allowed on DW_TAG_common_block.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40040
