------- Comment #17 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-16 22:24 ------- (In reply to comment #16) > Created an attachment (id=20403) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20403&action=view) [edit] > patch to stop error cascade > > This patch fixes the repeated error; it turns out I was wrong about this being > related to default int. Do you want to experiment more with this patch or > should I just check it in? >
I still don't understand why this fixes the problem, but whatever. What is the output with your patch? Do you think that my patch is to emit "recursively instantiated" would still be useful in general? Should I submit it properly? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9335
