------- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-14 01:32 ------- OK, I see it now. This is a little different from our previous encounters with overly big constructors. In fact, the code we had in place is still there, so we have whacked something. The test case does not fail at 65535 and does fail at 65536. I will study it a bit, but this may not be a quick one. (Unless I get lucky)
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43747
