------- Comment #1 from rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-05 13:55 ------- No, the canonical name for the CPU is correct -- with a dash.
-- rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED GCC target triplet| |arm Resolution| |INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34523