------- Comment #17 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2010-04-01 15:42 ------- Subject: Re: ___emutls_v.__gcov_indirect_call_[counters|callee] undefined on *-*-darwin*
On 04/01/2010 01:27 PM, howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu wrote: > ------- Comment #14 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2010-04-01 > 11:27 ------- > Reverting back to... > > TREE_PUBLIC (ic_void_ptr_var) = 0; > > in the proposed patch results in the missing symbols again. > Can we just leave... > > TREE_PUBLIC (ic_void_ptr_var) = 1; No, I don't see how this can be correct. The symbols must _not_ be coalesced, that's why TREE_PUBLIC is zero. Paolo -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43602
