------- Comment #7 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-04-01 12:17 ------- (In reply to comment #6) > What is invaild about the code is that t1%p1() and t2%p2() are not > initialization expressions. Everthing works fine, when the tables are > allocatable.
That was the origin of my question about the validity of the code. > BTW: gfortran produces correct code for the variant when the procedures are > not > procedure pointers. I stumpled over this OCE when rewriting some code. Why would this make the code valid? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43591
