------- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-26 10:05 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > There is a mismatch in a guard expression. Following patch fixes ICE for me > (I'm not sure if it makes any sense, though): > > Index: stor-layout.c > =================================================================== > --- stor-layout.c (revision 157742) > +++ stor-layout.c (working copy) > @@ -1346,8 +1346,8 @@ place_field (record_layout_info rli, tre > until we see a bitfield (and come by here again) we just skip > calculating it. */ > if (DECL_SIZE (field) != NULL > - && host_integerp (TYPE_SIZE (TREE_TYPE (field)), 0) > - && host_integerp (DECL_SIZE (field), 0)) > + && host_integerp (TYPE_SIZE (TREE_TYPE (field)), 1) > + && host_integerp (DECL_SIZE (field), 1)) > { > HOST_WIDE_INT bitsize = tree_low_cst (DECL_SIZE (field), 1); > HOST_WIDE_INT typesize >
The patch is pre-approved if it passes bootstrap & regtest. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43528