------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-25 18:47 -------
>it should be non-dependent.
Except DR 224 changed that. See also PR 9634 comment #3 which shows that it is
not dependent at all.
And the trunk has the same behavior as 4.4.
So this code is invalid as DR 224 changed the wording such that name is non
dependent. Sorry to say that but it is just a weird case.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43522
