------- Comment #6 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca  2010-03-17 
18:19 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.5 Regression] ICE in stage1 compiling __bswapdi2

> var-tracking expects that if frame_pointer_rtx (resp. arg_pointer_rtx,
> depending on whether FRAME_POINTER_CFA_OFFSET or ARG_POINTER_CFA_OFFSET is
> defined)
> is said to be eliminated (to stack_pointer_rtx in case of
> !frame_pointer_needed), then it is actually eliminated.  Apparently that's not
> the case on PA, which happily uses both %r3 and %r30 in the code.

ELIMINABLE_REGS isn't defined, we have the default frame pointer
elimination.  If the frame pointer has been eliminated, then %r3
shouldn't be the frame pointer.  I see that %r3 is used in the code
but it's not used as the frame pointer.

Dave


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43403

Reply via email to