------- Comment #19 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-15 15:12 ------- A variant of the #c9 patch is checked in for many days, do you still have something where VTA is really so big compile time or memory hog (besides PR43058)?
-- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |WAITING http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41371