------- Comment #19 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-03-15 15:12 -------
A variant of the #c9 patch is checked in for many days, do you still have
something where VTA is really so big compile time or memory hog (besides
PR43058)?


-- 

jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |WAITING


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41371

Reply via email to