------- Comment #1 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-08 10:33 ------- The docs for typeof say "A typeof-construct can be used anywhere a typedef name could be used." That implies it should work in a nested-name-specifier.
However, the typeof behaviour is consistent with decltype, and the C++0x grammar does not allow decltype in a nested-name-specifier, only in a simple-type-specifier. If typeof is supposed to work the same way as decltype then the docs should be updated to reflect that. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43285
