------- Comment #11 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-06 12:18 -------
(In reply to comment #10)
> However, with so many lines of legacy code out there using bit-filed that have
> been proven to work, it doesn't make sense to revisit/modify them. Would it
> be
> possible for gcc to provide a -Wbitfield-conversion flag in new releases and
> make 39170 an enhancement (preferably high priority)?
Seriously, I am not the "maintainer" of GCC diagnostics or even Wconversion.
Anyone can contribute!
Yes, it may be possible to provide such an option. I am not against such an
option and even if I were I cannot stop you from implementing it and getting it
approved by GCC maintainers. I don't know how much work it would be to
implement it, and out of kindness I might invest some of my free time to try to
do it for GCC 4.6. But even if I might try, that won't happen before summer
almost for sure, and then GCC 4.6 won't be available before late next year.
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |enhancement
Status|WAITING |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-03-06 12:18:44
date| |
Summary|cannot silence -Wconversion |provide an option to silence
|warnings for bit-fields |-Wconversion warnings for
| |bit-fields
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39170
