------- Comment #6 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-03-03 20:10 ------- Bah, frankly WONTFIX doesn't seem correct either: we are not taking about a *bug* which we are not going to fix. We are talking about a largely *unimplemented* part of the future C++1x standard. Now, in my opinion, almost completely *unimplemented* features do not really belong to Bugzilla, it's way to too early for it.
Unless we want to limit the span of this PR to the TR1 version: in that case, WONTFIX could be slightly more correct in the sense that we may well never implement the TR1 version of regex, but frankly it's not sure, it depends on whether it turns out to be feasible with a decent amount of macros and such. But I don't care much either way. I wanted only to clarify that the real issue is known, and we (the library maintainers) we don't consider it a bug, but a big chunk of work awaiting for somebody volunteering to do it ;) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43241
