------- Comment #2 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-02-25 22:12 
-------
Miscompilations are always nasty I guess... Simply don't use thin pointers,
they are quite inefficient.


-- 

ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot|
                   |org                         |
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |dot org                     |org
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2010-02-25 22:12:16
               date|                            |
            Summary|Wrong handling of null for  |[4.4/4.5 regression] run
                   |fat pointers forced thin by |time crash on null for thin
                   |size clause                 |pointers
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.4.5


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42253

Reply via email to