------- Comment #2 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-25 22:12
-------
Miscompilations are always nasty I guess... Simply don't use thin pointers,
they are quite inefficient.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot|
|org |
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-02-25 22:12:16
date| |
Summary|Wrong handling of null for |[4.4/4.5 regression] run
|fat pointers forced thin by |time crash on null for thin
|size clause |pointers
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42253