------- Comment #2 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-25 22:12 ------- Miscompilations are always nasty I guess... Simply don't use thin pointers, they are quite inefficient.
-- ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot| |org | AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-02-25 22:12:16 date| | Summary|Wrong handling of null for |[4.4/4.5 regression] run |fat pointers forced thin by |time crash on null for thin |size clause |pointers Target Milestone|--- |4.4.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42253