------- Comment #13 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-24 20:14 ------- (In reply to comment #9) > > I'd close this one as WONTFIX or mark it as dup of a "do uninitialized > variable warnings for memory". >
Please no, this perhaps could still be implemented in the C++ front-end for this particular case. Maybe there is a way to keep track of which initializers have been seen already and which members are not initialized elsewhere. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19808
