------- Comment #13 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-17 16:02 -------
(In reply to comment #11)
> Replying to myself (comment #10):
> > I think one should really send a interpretation request.
>
> I have now created one and sent it to Van.
>
Did you include the language from F2008 that make this
clearly nonconforming code?
> > What about POINTERs?
> Pointers seem to be treated similarly to allocatables. (I should have read the
> standard first).
Or comment #2.
>
> > A patch would be the following.
>
> It of cause fails (ICE) for WRITE(*,nml=...) as the front end creates:
> _gfortran_st_set_nml_var_dim (&dt_parm.1, 0, );
> ^^^
>
I've removed the reject-valid keyword, because until an official
intrep is given there is conflicting language in the standard.
--
kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|rejects-valid |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43062
