------- Comment #10 from gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2010-02-12 00:20 ------- Subject: Re: Strange behaviour of valarray::apply method
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 6:08 PM, paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > ------- Comment #9 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-02-12 00:08 > ------- > Gaby, any chance you can give me some guidance about this issue? What do you > think should we do now? The PR remained in limbo for way too much time, in my > opinion. Thanks in advance. at the moment, I believe fixing this means throwing away the current valarray implementation. I'm fine with that if someone proposes a better implementation performance-wise. Personal opinion: I do not think that the case submitted is an examplar of the usage envisioned for valarray. If you want to take address into a valarray object, create a valarray object. Don't stick references into the middle temporaries. But, that is - again - a personal opinion. -- Gaby -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9679
