------- Comment #4 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-11 05:29 ------- Thanks for pointing out that this has changed since C++03, though the change was to fix to something that was clearly broken.
In any case, I disagree with issue 983. The point of the example is that it doesn't matter what subobject it refers to, as the type of &D::i is 'int B::*'. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41796
