------- Comment #5 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-02-06 18:08 ------- > Could somebody more fluent in Fortran rewrite the testcase under the same > format as the testcase of PR42637 with a condition like this: ...
Is IMPLICIT NONE INTEGER, PARAMETER :: dp=KIND(0.0D0) REAL(KIND=dp) :: res res=exp_radius_very_extended( 0 , 1 , 0 , 1, & (/0.0D0,0.0D0,0.0D0/),& (/1.0D0,0.0D0,0.0D0/),& (/1.0D0,0.0D0,0.0D0/),& 1.0D0,1.0D0,1.0D0,1.0D0) if (res.ne.1.0d0) call abort() CONTAINS ... what you want? Note that the test passes at revision 156540 on x86_64-apple-darwin10, so I am not sure that it is a duplicate of 42637. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42558