------- Comment #2 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-01-30 22:06 -------
Is this to avoid false positives, because there's only a hazard if the thing is
actually dereferenced later on (or if it's cast back to the "correct" type)?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42908

Reply via email to