------- Comment #11 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-30 21:41 ------- It probably does, actually, because next is the first field.
But anyway, still INVALID. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42907
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org Sat, 30 Jan 2010 13:42:10 -0800
------- Comment #11 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-30 21:41 ------- It probably does, actually, because next is the first field.
But anyway, still INVALID. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42907