------- Comment #11 from tstdenis at elliptictech dot com 2010-01-27 15:57
-------
(In reply to comment #10)
> To be clear: nobody closed this bug, ever. And talking about apathy is plain
> offensive, or maybe you are just ignorant of the trade-offs involved in this
> area.
I didn't say you did close the bug I said you probably should if everyone is
apathetic as you appear to be.
I don't care if commercial compilers miss this, GCC claims to detect this sort
of bug, it doesn't, that's a bug. Furthermore, it is detectable in an
automated way [e.g., coverity] so it's not like I'm asking to boil the ocean or
whatever... Whether it's high priority or not [I don't think it is] is not at
issue. So stop being so dismissive about it.
--
tstdenis at elliptictech dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version|4.3.3 |unknown
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42884
