------- Comment #32 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2010-01-21 20:25 -------
I would like RMs to reconsider the priority of this bug, since it shows
weakness in the generic part of the compiler. Please see comments #20, #25 (and
#26) for the analysis.
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P4 |P3
Summary|[4.5 Regression] r147980 |[4.5 Regression] stdarg pass
|(New SRA) breaks stdargs |produces wrong code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41089
