------- Comment #10 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-01-15 18:32 ------- Subject: Re: _Complex_I is reported as undeclared. Code builds with Sun compiler.
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010, david dot kirkby at onetel dot net wrote: > Is this is trivial fix that could be implemted quickly, or it will require > quite a bit of work, and so I should not expect a solution soon? It could be implemented quickly if someone familiar with fixincludes wishes to fix it. > Is there any workaround you can suggest? Would simply adding > > #define _Complex_I _Complex_I > #define complex _Complex > #define _Imaginary_I _Imaginary_I > #define imaginary _Imaginary > #undef I > #define I _Imaginary_I > > at the top of the source files work? Adding copies of the non-GCC definitions certainly won't work. I suppose you could add #undef of the problem macros followed by #define to values valid for GCC (such as those used by glibc), after including any system headers. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42753
